
In case you missed the story this weekend,
Escondido is facing a potential lawsuit from a resident who feels she has been done wrong. Here is a link to the story: "
Woman Receives $16,000 Water Bill" or
View the video here
Looking at the story here it seems fairly straightforward. If the resident is going through 3 swimming pools worth of water per day, someone would have to notice the water pooling up or causing some erosion to the area where the leak is. There seems to be no evidence of this mentioned other than water potentially drainging into a nearby creek.
According to the story, "The city has since replaced the meter, and Kreusser has added new water
pipes. Her water rate is back to normal, but the city said she still
owes the $16,000." If replacing the meter and adding some new pipes has caused this to return to normal, the answer should be easy for the city. Give this resident a break and waive the bill.
Instead they offered to slash the bill to $8000 and as a result this resident is slapping Escondido with a $300,000 lawsuit. To us, this seems a bit extreme, but we will keep watching to see why $300,000 was the amount the resident is suing for.
In the meantime, with the City of Escondido and Escondido Utilities unable to comment on this story due to pending litigation, the taxpayers here in Escondido are left with only one side of the story. However, looking at the total cost of fighting this lawsuit and the added staff resources that will be allocated to this, it only makes sense for the city to do the right thing and waive the bill for the month in question.
As for Margaret Kreusser, we encourage you to do the right thing as well if Escondido does and drop this lawsuit.
George Herbert sums it up best, "A lean compromise is better than a fat lawsuit."
"A lean compromise is better than a fat lawsuit."
"A lean compromise is better than a fat lawsuit."